|
Post by Newcastle Red Star on Feb 27, 2020 13:55:49 GMT
Just throwing this out there as it's something we do in another league I'm in.
What are people's thoughts on a rule whereby you could release a player and opt to pay all the costs up front?
As an example, if I had an underperforming player on $6m for 3 years that I wanted shut of, I'd have to have a cap hit of $1.5m this year then watch $3m go off my budget for each of the next 2 years. If I've got the $8m or so of cap space now and I'm not competing, it'd be in my interests to spend the money this year and get that budget space in the next auction.
It'd help teams get rid of bad contracts and get back to being competitive more quickly, and less likely to have to hold on to bad players because of the cost of removing them. It could also facilitate more trading, if there's a team with plenty of cap space in rebuild mode then they could take more bad contracts and some prospects/useful players with them from competing teams.
Obviously, if you don't have the space or would rather the payments spread out then the old system would remain the default, but I can see it being a useful tweak to the rules and make the league more competitive.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Franklin Lakes Fonzinoons on Feb 27, 2020 15:55:02 GMT
I am in favor of this. Agree that it provides flexibility to get out of bad contracts and more trading. Both good things.
|
|
|
Post by Reading Fightin Phils on Feb 28, 2020 1:55:59 GMT
Sounds good to me
|
|
|
Post by East Bay Rats on Feb 29, 2020 4:45:14 GMT
Garreth, can you post a poll on proboards about the rule change? It can be voted on this year & implemented next year if it passes.
|
|
|
Post by Newcastle Red Star on Feb 29, 2020 17:44:36 GMT
Yeah, will write something up
|
|